Photoshop is something we see
everywhere. We look at an advertisement of these flawless models and
celebrities with their perfect hair and bodies and at some time or another or
all the time have wished we could look like them. As advertisements continue to
use Photoshop to change their own original photos to what is believed to be
“beautiful” in American society, the question of body image issues come up. Has
Photoshop destroyed body image in America? First, we must look at what
Photoshop is. Photoshop is a product of Adobe Systems, which is used to edit
graphics whether the graphics are taken with a professional camera or created
within the program itself. Photoshop has many tools to help define and enhance
the graph such as a healing brush to fix blemishes as well as a blurring tool
to blur images you don’t want the focus on. The art of Photoshop is called
photoshopping. The next question we ask is, have photographers abused their art
of photoshopping causing America to see unrealistic human beings modeled on
their favorite magazine or website?
As stated by Huffingtonpost contributor,
Vivian Diller writes most people and celebrities dream of magically removing
the extra pounds and their annoying wrinkles; more people are seeing Photoshop
as dangerous territory. Actress Kate Winslet is among many celebrities who
think Photoshop has gone to far with it’s editing and the American Medical
Association (AMA) is beginning to agree with this. Winslet was one of the first
to break ground when she took action against GQ magazine for digitally altering
her body in its photographs by making her unrealistically thin. The AMA has
announced its stand against image manipulation in advertising, declaring that
modifications made through the art of using Photoshop can contribute to
unrealistic body image expectations, eating disorders, and other emotional
problems for younger audiences. This has gotten mixed reviews and reactions
from the professionals who Photoshop and the public who view it.
There are two sides of this
Photoshop argument, the ones who believe Photoshop isn’t the problem and the
ones who believe it is. Elizabeth Perle, a HuffingtonPost writer, believes that
Photoshop isn’t the evil one in this situation. She believes that it is the
media are the ones who influence photographers and magazines to alter their
pictures. Photoshop was created with the soul purpose of bringing objects into
focus and not creating pieces of deception. The media has used this program to
create an unreachable form of “beauty”.
The other side of the argument is that Photoshop helps contribute to the
media instead of being the one being manipulated. Younger audiences who see the
images plastered all over their magazines and favorite websites will more
likely try to resemble the models. The AMA wants to raise awareness to show
younger audiences that the models they see aren’t the same in real life as they
are in the magazines. This begins argument brings up the question of is it
ethical to be showcasing unrealistic and unreachable attributes to American
audiences.
The use of Photoshop should be used
for small fixes such as fixing minor things like undereye circles or blemishes
but should not be used to make models skinnier or have more muscles. These
extreme photoshopped images give younger audiences and even older audiences the
wrong idea. They may cause the viewer to extreme diet to try to reach the
unreal weight of the model. If a younger person does this extreme diet, this
may affect their development not only physically but mentally as well. The child might develop a serious eating or
mental disorder due to this unobtainable “beauty” made by Photoshop. Many companies are seeing the ethical impact
of the issue of over photoshopping their images and are doing something about
it. Aerie, a lingerie store from American Eagle, decided in the spring of 2014
to not retouch their models and allow everything to be real. It is proven from
multiple surveys that young women's sense of body confidence is mostly
influenced by the images of female beauty they see in media. While one ad
campaign won't solve the complicated relationship between young women's
self-esteems and images of women in media, it can certainly helps for women to
see a brand shows off its cute bras and undies on bodies with real rolls, lines
and curves.
Sources:
Well-stated concerns here! You rightfully point out how some companies - you mention Aerie, but Dove is another - have designed ad campaigns to target those folks who might reject the "perfect" photo-shopped body image. Remember, however, that every one of these companies, even those who seem insensitive to all those with non-perfect bodies, are trying to get folks to buy their stuff. If the public decides that a company doesn't deserve their patronage (as they did following the very offensive comments made by the CEO of a company that made popular yoga-clothes), then the company will fail. Are you suggesting that companies be forced to advertise in a particular way - so as to NOT make certain people uncomfortable with their body image? Would you suggest that a limitation on the use of PhotoShop will result in an improvement to the psychology of adolescent women in our society? You do a great job expressing an important concern here - but remember that when any restrictions are placed upon public communication, that should be very concerning too. Keep working!
ReplyDelete